Divorce after 50

by admin on July 3, 2012

Collaborative Divorce Proves that Breaking Up Doesn’t Have to Be Hard to Do

Divorce after 50 calls for creative problem solving utilizing collaborative family law. Linda Piff, the pioneer of collaborative law in New Jersey says, “Divorce after 50 years of age calls for creative problem solving.”

WALL, NJ, June 25, 2012 /24-7PressRelease/ — Ending a marriage is never an easy decision, but divorce can be especially daunting for couples older than 50. According to the National Center for Family and Marriage Research at Bowling Green State University, the divorce rate for people older than 50 has doubled in the last 20 years, and bady boomers now account for roughly one in four divorces in the US today.

By the time they reach 50,many boomers are on their second or third marriages, and those marriages are statiscally less likely to last.

Linda Piff, a Wall, NJ-based divorce attorney is devoted to mediation, collaborative divorce, uncontested divorce and matrimonial agreement.

As Linda Piff explains, “Irreconcilable differences and the grounds most commonly cited by the older couples. The kids are way at college or have left home, and the conversation, and daily issues do not involve the kids anymore, for many it becomes issue in the marriage which lead to separation and divorce.”

Piff and former colleague, attorney Jeff Horn, pioneered the “collaborative divorce’ concept in 2005, when the ethics committee of the State Supreme Court gave them approval to practice collaborative law.

In Collaborative Divorce, a couple agrees to avoid formal litigation as a means of deciding support and who-gets what issues.One accountant and/or a collaboratively trained, neutral financial planner can negotiate for settling issues regarding assets being divided – including business valuation or pre-taxed retirement accounts.

As Piff explains, “A Collaborative Divorce generally cost one-third the amount of litigated divorce, and most can be accomplished with one to six mouths. The focus is on reaching a mutually agreed upon settlement of all disputes by using a team approach instead of being adversaries. Meetings can be schedules without waiting for court dates, saving both parties and money. Collaborative divorce with creative problem solving replaces recrimination and revenge, fixing problems rather than fixing blame.”

 

 

New Zealand has finished 13th in the global marathon to legalise gay marriage. But while many of our New Zealand cousins are celebrating their victory, Australia seems to have stopped at a rest area on the side of the road with no finish line in sight.

Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard remains unmoved from her stance against gay marriage remarking point-blank, that she would not be changing her mind on the issue.

Any voters looking for opposition to Labours anti-gay marriage stance will not find it in Opposition leader Tony Abbot, whose stance against gay marriage appears to be as firm as ever. ”We had a parliamentary vote on this just a few months ago and it was fairly decisively rejected. That’s what this parliament had done,” Mr Abbott said.

However in the parliamentary vote that Mr Abbott was referring to, Liberal MP’s were not permitted a conscience vote forcing all Liberal members to fall in with the ‘anti-gay marriage’ party line, disregarding their own beliefs on the issue. Labour MP’s were entitled to a conscience vote however the bid to legalise same sex marriage was ultimately unsuccessful.   While many gay and lesbian Australian couples are thrilled with the news that their dreams of tying the knot is only a three hour flight away, many have also expressed their discontent that they would wed in New Zealand only to ”leave their marriage at the customs gate” when they return to Australia.

Greens member, Senator Hanson-Young said ”We are happy for our New Zealand cousins but we want to see it here.” While legalising same-sex marriage looks less than promising in Australia’s near future, many Australians including Tony Abbott’s daughters believe gay marriage is only a matter of time.

”I believe it is inevitable,” Frances Abbott, 21, told the weekend’s Daily Telegraph. ”I believe by the time our generation gets into power, I hope and pray something is done about marriage equality and gay rights.” Bridget Abbot agreed with her sister’s views stating that “being gay is a lot more accepted and open for our generation.”

Rodney Croome, Australian Marriage Equality national director said Mr Abbott’s daughters were ”typical of their generation”. Their support in spite of their father’s views, showed same-sex marriage was inevitable. Mr Croome stressed however, that gay and lesbian couples should not have to wait a generation for marriage equality.

Nevertheless at the rate that the Australian government is progressing on the issue, that is exactly what gay and lesbian couples may have to do. If gay marriage really is inevitable it seems archaic and limiting to hold onto the views of yesterday. It may sadly however, be up to future generations to take the lead and finish the global marathon for gay marriage equality. But until that time Australia looks like it will be sitting on the side of the road to change, for a little bit longer.

Families Beware of Facebook Despair

August 27, 2012

My mother told me a lot of things growing up, but I always remembered the day she told me that the first rule of law was to “never write anything down.” She meant this of course to be anything that you wouldn’t want “shouted from the rooftops.” But in an electronic world where every thought [...]

Read the full article →

RELOCATION, RELOCATION, INTERNATIONAL RELOCATION

June 26, 2012

The recent case of the four “missing” girls has been the focus of attention in the news headlines. The case isn’t about children being returned to Italy to live with their father against their wishes and in defiance of their mother’s claims that father is abusive. It is about what is the best jurisdiction or [...]

Read the full article →

Amendments to the Family Law Act

April 12, 2012

On 7 December 2011 new amendments to the Family Law Act were passed. The new legislation commences on 7 June 2012. The amendments include an updated definition of family violence to include violent, threatening or other behavior by a person who coerces or controls a member of the person’s family (the family member) or causes [...]

Read the full article →

What are the real costs of separating?

March 7, 2012

A recent article “Lifting the veil on the true cost of saying I do” in The Age on claims that current statistics show that the average spend on today’s wedding is up to $35,000 and nowadays most couples are paying these costs themselves. Couples planning a wedding or considering moving in together are looking forward [...]

Read the full article →

Same sex marriage

February 23, 2012

Same sex, or gay marriage has been a topic of discussion by Australians for many years. The recent dinner hosted by the Prime Minister has once again highlighted the issue and the fact that where other countries such as Canada have legislated in favour of gay marriage, Australia has not. One wonders what the rationale [...]

Read the full article →

Keeping your kids safe during separation & divorce

February 7, 2012

Adele Horin’s article “Parental ‘poison’ of kids on rise” in the Age on 6 February 2012 claims a study has found that warring parents in Family Court disputes are claiming former partners are poisoning their children against each other. Parenting is for life. Great care should be taken to preserve parenting relationships for the children’s [...]

Read the full article →